It runs inside the timing rules you set, in your tone, and it stops the moment someone disputes a charge.
Published June 2, 2026
The reason collections suits an agent is not that it is clever. It is that it is consistent, and consistency is exactly what a person working a past due list at the end of a long week cannot promise.
It reads balances from your system, runs a per account sequence within the timing rules you set and in your tone, and makes paying the easiest thing on the resident's list.
Collections is unpleasant work. It is the first thing to slip when a week gets busy, and the slipping is uneven: the accounts that get chased are the ones somebody remembered, which is not the same as the ones that most need chasing.
Uneven enforcement is also where risk lives. If some residents get three reminders and others get none, you have created a difference in treatment that you cannot explain from a process, because there was not one.
The dispute rule is the most important one and the one most worth testing during the build. The moment a resident says a charge is wrong, the conversation stops being a collections sequence and becomes a service issue, and continuing to send reminders into that is how a small disagreement becomes a complaint.
A meaningful share of late payment is friction rather than refusal. Somebody meant to pay, could not find the portal, did not have the login, and then a week passed.
A reminder that includes a way to pay in the same message removes that. Over text that is a hosted pay link; over a call the payment can be taken verbally through hosted checkout. Card details never pass through Stomeji, and the agent only sees that the payment cleared.
Payment plans, hardship conversations, anything heading towards eviction, and any account where the resident is distressed. These need judgement and authority, and they need a human who can make a decision.
The agent's role is to handle the large volume of routine reminders that mostly resolve themselves, so your team's attention goes to the small number of accounts that genuinely need a conversation.
We describe how the system behaves. We do not hold third-party certifications and we do not claim to, and collections rules vary by state in ways that matter.
Your specific requirements are worth walking through properly on a call with somebody who knows your jurisdiction, rather than taking from a blog post. What we can commit to is that the rules you set are the rules it follows, every time, with a record of it.
The wording of a past due reminder is worth more thought than it usually gets, because these messages go to people you want to keep as residents.
A first reminder three days late is almost always going to somebody who forgot, whose payment failed, or who is between pay dates. Treating that person like a defaulter costs you a renewal for the sake of a message. A reminder at thirty days is a different conversation with a different tone, and the sequence should reflect that escalation deliberately rather than sending the same wording throughout.
This is one of the clearer advantages of writing the sequence down. When a person chases balances, tone varies with their mood and how the rest of their day went. Written once and reviewed, it does not.
On the site
Keep reading